Bangladesh is one of the most populous countries in the South Asian region. The country is facing rapid urbanisation due to factors such as poverty, natural disaster and better employment opportunities which causes people to move to urban areas. Its capital, Dhaka, is one of the planet’s fastest growing megacities, where an estimated 300,000-400,000 migrants, mostly poor people from rural areas arrive annually. A vast majority of these migrants end up living in slums or informal urban settlements. These informal urban settlements tend to be located in low-lying, flood-prone, poorly drained areas, with limited formal rubbish disposal and minimal access to clean water and sanitation. These areas are severely crowded, with between four and five people living in houses of just over 100 square feet. These are generally excluded from public sector resources, severely limiting residents’ access to formal education, health care, water and sanitation.
The urban poor are mostly engaged in low-paid, labour-intensive work in the informal sector, with rickshaw-pulling and construction day labour being the dominant employers followed by small business. Around 80% of new migrants (males) are employed as rickshaw pullers. For women living in the informal urban settlements, employment options are limited to garments work, domestic service, and manual labour. These women tend to be excluded from jobs in the transport sector, most skilled craft work, service industry and retail sector jobs.
The predicted rise in population density will be severely exacerbated by climate change. A sea-level rise of 1.5 metres will submerge 15% of the country’s landmass, increasing the population density and the challenges in meeting people’s basic human rights. Although urbanisation drives economic development of a country, there are growing concerns of its effects on food security, health, and environment.
Health and social issues
In Bangladesh, provision of healthcare for the people living in informal urban settlements is inadequate, and falls under the responsibilities of the local government and not the Ministry of Health. Lack of coordination between government bodies, shortage of human resource and inadequate financial resources lead to poor quality of services for the urban poor.
The newly migrated urban poor are faced with a pluralistic health system, consisting of informal providers such as local traditional healers, quacks, drug shop attendants; as well as government and NGO-run health facilities. These people often do not seek formal healthcare due to issues of distance and transportation cost, long waiting lines, lack of information and neglect in last visit, which discourage them from going to these providers. Instead, they prefer the local informal providers and NGOs, which are more accessible.
Many non-profit organisations provide healthcare services in these slums, particularly maternal and child care services. These include BRAC Manoshi, Dushtha Shasthya Kendra’s health care programme, Marie Stopes maternal and reproductive health services etc. Besides these, there is also the Urban Primary Health Care Services Delivery Project, a public private partnership with local NGOs to help provide primary healthcare services to slum dwellers in some areas.
People living in these areas experience social, economic and political exclusion. Evidence shows large disparities among the urban population between ‘slum’ and ‘non-slum’ areas in terms of food security, nutrition, access to clean water and sanitation, and health indicators. Air, noise and water pollution lead to direct health hazards. There is a lack of ventilation and outdoor space. Eviction and the threat of eviction have severe social, economic and psychological effects, all of which reinforce poverty and social exclusion and its impact on the lives of the urban poor.
The rights of people living in informal urban settlements in Bangladesh are neither recognised nor protected. There is no explicit or comprehensive policy on urbanisation and urban poverty. This constitutes a major constraint for NGOs, donor agencies, and even some government officials working in informal urban settlements. The state’s ambivalence towards urban policy is shown in the conflicting dual metropolitan power structure. Although the Dhaka City Corporation is autonomous and its mayor and ward commissioners are elected by Dhaka’s citizens, its power is controlled by the Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives. Implicit in the lack of urban policy is the assumption that informal settlements are temporary, resulting in the denial of programmes explicitly for the urban poor.
As informal settlements are considered ‘illegal’, populations who live there often have no official address and are commonly denied basic rights and entitlements, including the right to access water, sanitation, health services and education. Informal urban settlements continue to be demolished by successive governments. Eviction and the threat of eviction, as well as the absence of a policy framework, discourage interventions to improve residents’ long-term prospects.
Often in these slum settlements, a partisan based system is found. It is seen that business protection, arrangement of livelihood, provision of amenities in households such as water or electricity are given out as favor, and in exchange the slum dwellers have to show loyalty to the local powerful individual in the form of votes, or participation in rallies for a specific political party.
Government neglect has created a space in which non-state institutions compete to govern access to and use of resources, such as land for housing, services, jobs and urban space, in more or less benign or criminal ways. State actors are often complicit in this competition. Water and sanitation facilities are governed by diverse actors from the public, private and NGO sector, leading to sharp contrasts in wellbeing across sites.
Non-governmental actors are critical to efforts to provide services and improve the conditions of people living in informal settlements. The organised participation of female and male settlement dwellers in planning and controlling services has been found to be vital for their success. However, monitoring and regulation of NGO services are weak and accountability mechanisms to the people they serve are unclear. Organisations of informal settlement dwellers are essential to improve conditions and reduce exclusion. Projects have shown that people who live in informal settlements are willing and able to organise and pay for services if the opportunity is given. The Coalition for the Urban Poor is an association of organisations working to improve the lives of people living in informal settlements.
Sabina Faiz Rashid, Strategies to Reduce Exclusion among Populations Living in Urban Slum Settlements in Bangladesh. J HEALTH POPUL NUTR 2009 Aug;27(4):574-586.
Bangladesh Health Watch report 2014, Urban Health Scenario, looking beyond 2015, (Eds Ahmed SH, Islam FK, Bhuyia A)
te Lintelo D.J.H., Gupte J, McGregor J.A., Lakshmana R, Jahan F. Wellbeing and urban governance: Who fails, survives or thrives in informal settlements in Bangladeshi cities? Cities 72 (2018) 391–402.
Banks, Nicola, Urban Poverty in Bangladesh: Causes, Consequences and Coping Strategies (October 25, 2012). University of Manchester, BWPI Working Paper 178. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2166863 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2166863
Sajedul Islam Khan & Md Nazirul Islam Sarker* & Nazmul Huda & A. B. M. Nurullah & Md Rafiuz Zaman, 2018. “Assessment of New Urban Poverty of Vulnerable Urban Dwellers in the Context of Sub-Urbanization in Bangladesh,” The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(10), pages 184-193, 10-2018
Institute of Governance Studies, BRAC University. (2012). State of Cities: Urban Governance in Dhaka. Retrieved from http://dspace.bracu.ac.bd/xmlui/handle/10361/2055
Posts on Bangladesh
Community Engagement, Co-Production or Citizen Action? Lessons from COVID-19 Responses in India and Bangladesh’s Informal Urban Settlements
Government COVID-19 disease control efforts in many contexts have been critiqued as simultaneously inadequate and authoritarian, causing widespread suffering. “Top-down,” bio-security focused approaches aimed at achieving behavioral change through information dissemination and legal measures have often been ineffective in informal urban settlements, for a range of reasons related to the nature of citizen-state relationships. Community […]
Connecting citizens to science: Episode 3 – COVID-19 research and relationships with communities in informal settings for policy response
In this episode we talk about COVID-19 and how travel and public health restrictions presented challenges to ensuring that urban marginalised voices were heard by researchers and policy makers in India and Bangladesh. Our impressive guests Professor Sabina Faiz Rashid and Senior Research Fellow Dr Surekha Garimella discuss the importance of having established long-term relationships […]
“Responding to COVID-19: Community Preparedness and Management of Public Health Emergency” is a sub-project under the ARISE project supported by ARISE Responsive Fund. This project was co-designed and jointly implemented by ARISE project’s research partner BRAC James P Grant School of Public Health (JPGSPH), BRAC University, community mobilization partner BRAC Urban Development Programme (UDP) and […]
Social capital and accessing services and support during COVID-19 in informal settlements of Dhaka, Bangladesh: A cross sectional study
Authors: Farzana Manzoor, Wafa Alam, Imran Hossain, Nadia Farnaz, Bachera Aktar, Sabina Faiz Rashid Objective To explore different forms of social capital networks, exist in urban slums of Dhaka, Bangladesh and how these social capital networks were helpful during the pandemic. Method A cross-sectional study with a qualitative approach was conducted in three urban slums […]